![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Sponsors: UNF | UNEP | NCAR | UNU | WMO | ISDR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home >> Ecuador Executive Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Summary At the end of March 1997, anomalous conditions were present in both the tropical Pacific Ocean and the atmosphere. During May 1997, these anomalies and their patterns confirmed the development (onset) of an El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event that lasted until June 1998. Its evolution (phases of development) was similar to other events, but its timing was different. Information on the evolution of the 1997-98 El Niño and its probable impacts was disseminated as early as July 1997, based on the known impacts of the 1982-83 event. However, Ecuador's political instability – four presidents between 1996 and 1998 – took its toll when El Niño came in 1997, and Ecuadorians, in general, were not able to cope with its impacts. When an El Niño occurrence of unknown magnitude and duration was announced by the Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL) 31 May 1997, the private and governmental sectors became alarmed. The governmental response was quick but not effective. On 2 July 1997, a national emergency was declared by the president, under the National Security Law, giving the National Civil Defense the power to coordinate any action to cope with El Niño. A contingency plan was approved in July of 1997. However, instead of following the law, a permanent committee for coordination of actions to cope with the El Niño phenomenon was formed and named Comité Para Enfrentar del Fenómeno de El Niño (COPEFEN). At the beginning, it was put under the office of the president but later, due to widespread information about the misuse of international funds, it was placed in the vice-president's office. Several campaigns were launched to disseminate information about the potential impacts of El Niño on the areas of direct impact (the coastal plains west of the Andes), based on the impacts during the 1982-83 El Niño event. Some prevention campaigns, started as early as June 1997 and supported by the private and governmental sectors, were oriented toward impact mitigation as well as prevention. The impact scenarios were provided by several organizations working on El Niño and its impacts. ESPOL provided impact scenarios for the socioeconomic sectors. The Instituto Oceanográfico de la Armada (INOCAR, the Naval Oceanographic Institute) provided scenarios for the coastal areas and beaches. And the Instituto Nacional de la Pesca (INP, the National Institute of Fisheries) provided scenarios for the fisheries. These organizations, along with the University of Guayaquil, the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Marinas (CENAIM), the Catholic University of Guayaquil and others, are part of the Estudio Regional de Fenómeno El Niño (ERFEN, or the Regional Study of El Niño Phenomenon.)1 After August 1997, each organization started providing biweekly reports to the government and the general public. These impact scenarios could be developed because Ecuador is in the proverbial direct line of fire of El Niño. El Niño's impacts are felt directly when the Kelvin waves hit the western, equatorial coast of South America. Its physical effects from the 1982-83 El Niño, used as a forecasting analogue, are summarized below:
Socio-economic Impacts According to the Instituto Nacional de Estudística y Censos (INEC), the National Institute for Census and Statistics), El Niño events had a strong impact on the coastal and island populations of Ecuador, which make up 50% of the country's inhabitants. It is also important to notice the relative youth of this affected population: during 1997-98, approximately 34% of those affected were younger than 15 years old. The most important impacts of the 1997-98 event (in millions of dollars) are summarized in Table 1. Most of the flooded cities had problems with water supply, sewage, and damage to their infrastructures. Even though the affected urban population was larger, the rural populace suffered the most. The rural population remained isolated; the flooding destroyed their highways, bridges and roads, their lifelines to the cities. Much of their harvests and agricultural products were lost, raising market prices. Also, most of the rural communication and transport activities are done on third-level roads that, under Ecuadorian standards, are available only during the dry season. Table 1: Impact of El Niño2 (millions of US $)
Microeconomics An analysis of price variability based on two indices that reflect the microeconomic impact – the index for producer prices (IPP),3 for the national level, and the index for the urban consumer (IPCU), for the coastal plain level – shows the following:
When El Niño declined between June and August 1998, coastal highways remained rudimentary but still connected. The end of El Niño helped to normalize food distribution and to improve the transport of people and cargo between affected areas. The IPP fell in June 1998, while the IPCU had a speculative increase due to the second presidential round. By August 1998, El Niño's effects had almost disappeared from the Ecuadorian coast, while the chosen indices increased as they responded to the new government and its economic regime (NB: President Jamil Mahuad started his 4-year term in August 1998, lasting until 21 January 2000). Fisheries and Aquaculture Sardine (Sardinops sagax) landings were reduced drastically, while an increase was observed in Pacific anchoveta in chuhueco (Centengraulis mysticetus). But before drawing conclusions, the INP experts indicated that the effect of the sardine fleet's fishing closer than usual to the coast, in an area where chuhueco is usually predominant, must be taken into consideration. However, stocks of sardine and other pelagic species from Ecuador migrated southward toward the Peruvian-Chilean coast causing a reduction of 57% in total landings for 1997 (248,277 metric tons) with respect to 1996 (435,961 metric tons). As observed after previous El Niño events, a positive impact was an expectation for an increase in the recruitment of yellowfin tuna. This expectation was realized two years later, in 1999, resulting in large catches of tuna by the Latin American fleet. In the case of the shrimp industry, El Niño had both negative and positive effects. The most important positive effect was an increase of 40% in total exports during 1997 with respect to 1996. Agriculture These strong events negatively affected nearly all agricultural sectors and significantly affected those along the coast. Crop loss was due to the following problems:
The total area affected by the phenomenon reached 613,000 ha (15% of the total agricultural land of the coastal area). The total amount of direct losses estimated in agriculture was US$524 million, including the crops ready to be harvested but lost in 1997 due to the lack of transportation. The indirect losses due to the impossibility of the first sowing in 1998, was estimated at US$441.2 million. The total damage to the sector reached an estimated US$996 million. Health In Ecuador, several diseases have been associated with El Niño periods: V. cholerae, Campylobacter, C. botulinum, E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Hepatitis A, Malaria, Dengue, Leptospirosis, Leishmaniasis, Encephalitis, among others. There were four epidemic problems during the last El Niño (1997-98): cholera, leptospirosis, dengue and malaria. Each outbreak was enhanced by El Niño. However, the number of cholera cases during the 1991-92 event was 17 times those of 1997-98, indicating that the magnitude of an event is cause for its potential impact upon a disease. One reason for this dramatic decrease could have been the Contingency Plan of the Public Health Ministry for the prevention of epidemiological diseases, like malaria, cholera, dengue and leptospirosis. This plan had three target actions:
It is important to note that human health problems are also caused by secondary impacts. One problem of attribution comes from the fact that populations at poverty levels will always be affected, independent of the magnitude of an El Niño event, because of its higher vulnerability. El Niño Attributions Not all the damage reported by CEPAL4 and other institutions can be completely attributed to El Niño. Other underlying societal causes of the impacts include poverty, lack of education, bad and corrupt politicians, weak economical situation, among other factors, all of which need to be studied. If we did an analysis by sector, we could simplify and understand the reliability of these attributions. Agriculture: Excess rainfall, as a result of El Niño, did affect the size of the planted areas of different crops: bananas, sugar cane, rice, and soy. Also, air temperatures and cloudiness negatively affected some fruit plants, like mango, by preventing them from flowering. Flooding occurred in the same area, causing additional destruction. Health: In this sector, the problems were originally derived from poverty but were enhanced by El Niño. Lack of potable water, sewage treatment and drainage problems in small cities and rural communities make them good candidates for water-borne and vector-borne diseases, during even so-called normal conditions. When an El Niño event hits the country, these conditions are worsened, triggering an increase in disease. Prevention measurements depend on economic and human resources available from the Ministry of Health. Fisheries: El Niño directly affects this sector. The decrease in sardine fisheries and other small pelagic fish populations is due to an increase in ocean temperatures which caused them to migrate southward looking for cooler conditions. The rate of recovery of these fisheries is not fast. Some fisheries are positively affected, e.g., the shrimp and dolphin (magi magi) fisheries. Also, the activities of artisanal fishermen declined because of the higher surface wave activity during El Niño. Infrastructure: The maintenance of public infrastructure, such as highways, secondary roads and bridges, was not done properly during 1996. This was due to the presidential campaign and, in the earlier part of 1997, due to the country's political situation. Also, there are a lot of problems related to road construction, such as noncompliance with the regulations required for heavy rainfall episodes during a normal rainy season. Roads in Ecuador are not built to last. Therefore, the damage to public infrastructure is mainly due to poor construction and maintenance, and should not be attributed solely to El Niño. In relation to private infrastructure, especially housing, the problems are due to a lack of any "territorial order" (i.e., zoning regulation and/or enforcement). People living in rural zones, or urban margins, do not take into account whether they are on a river's flood plain, an unstable hillside, a dry river bed in a flooding area, etc., when they build their houses. Also, they do not use good materials for their construction. Therefore, most of the damage to the infrastructure should not be attributed to El Niño. Responses to Information Responses varied; those from the public sector (e.g., government) were markedly different than those from the private sector. The government established a unit under presidential control (COPEFEN) to coordinate all actions needed to mitigate the expected impacts of the event. However, this was largely ineffective because this organization did not take into account the organizational structure of the country in the case of a disaster. National Civil Defense should have been the agency in charge. The response of the private sector was fast, and largely more effective, because it is better organized under national and provincial chambers by sector, and especially because they were aware of the potential impacts of El Niño on each sector. However, we can identify several strengths and weaknesses in the responses of both sectors to the El Niño impact scenarios that were provided. Strengths
Weaknesses
Lessons Learned If a perfect forecast would have been available as early as October 1996, knowing what is known now about the actual impact that did take place in Ecuador, the responses could have been different, especially in the private sector and in the education sector. For example, the school year in the coastal provinces runs from April-May to December-January. Given a perfect forecast, there would have been enough time for developing an educational campaign at the high school level that could have had a positive impact mainly on the urban population. Government responses might also have been different because there was, at the time, a president from the Ecuadorian coast who was running the country. In general, however, the political and socio-economic situations of the country are the ones that most influence any possible response to an El Niño event. There are some lessons to be learned from an analysis of the socio-economic and political settings during the 1997-98 El Niño, of its impacts and the country's responses. These lessons must be taken into account before the impacts of the next event plague the country. The lessons summarized below are not in order of importance. Several of these lessons, drawn from the project's Brief Executive Summary Report prepared for the Millennium UN General Assembly, were considered applicable to the Ecuadorian country case study.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home >> Ecuador Executive Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||